The December 2025 issue of JPH included a series of articles that attack realism in philosophy of history. A couple of these articles that extensively and critically discuss my work are particularly marked by flawed and defective reasoning. Since the Journal of the Philosophy of History has refused to publish my response, I am making it public here. Those interested in academic standards and editorial practices might notice that the Journal of the Philosophy of History would publish criticism of an author by one of their editors but refuse to let that author respond. Some of them could even contemplate whether a refusal to publish a response by an author who was referred to thirty-five times in the volume (not counting footnotes) should count as censorship.